(redirected from paralogisms)
Also found in: Dictionary, Medical, Encyclopedia.
Graphic Thesaurus  🔍
Display ON
Animation ON
  • noun

Words related to paralogism

an unintentionally invalid argument

Related Words

References in periodicals archive ?
The arguments of the Paralogisms are intended to undercut the necessarily subreptive nature of any non-critical response to such questions by preventing the objectification of subjective, transcendental conditions of objective knowledge.
(35) At the same time he reassures us that, unlike other more elaborate romances, Cloria does not depend on and will not elicit the paralogisms or "false conjectures, which in a Romance, is not proper." Instead, he assures us, the romance form of Cloria will "stir up the appetite of the Reader to a continuance," not only to continued reading but also to continued equitable reasoning and political allegiance.
In line with its documentary nature, the Academy edition includes in separate volumes the complete second edition and the first half of the first edition, through the Paralogisms of Pure Reason, of the first Critique.
While myth perpetuates culture, explains spiritual and material phenomena (paralogisms), and offers cosmogonic narratives (frames for Native American worldviews), when these scholars attempt to explain how myths change, adapt, and expand, a focus on performance emerges.
This fact provides an attractive interpretation, in chapters 7 and 8, of Kant's claim in the Paralogisms that although we must think of the subject as one thing, we should not conclude that that subject is in itself a simple, persisting substance.
And Kant argues, in the Paralogisms, the Antinomy and the Ideal of Pure Reason, that to consider the Ideas as objects leads to contradiction and Schwarmerei.
Ad arguments have been historically identified with fallacies and therefore considered as invalid or faulty arguments closely related to sophisms, paralogisms, and other forms of pseudo-reasoning.
The thinking in which nothing is thought can be none other than the 'I think' that "must be able to accompany all my representations" (B 131); but it is, as Kant shows in the chapter on the Paralogisms, absolutely empty and without content.
The "Paralogisms of Pure Reason" are fallacious syllogisms for which the reason has transcendental grounds; that is, the reason makes sense out of its operations by supposing what, on logical grounds, cannot be admitted.
Most importantly, two distinct meanings of "I think" need be distinguished: (1) in the Transcendental Deduction "I think" is the act of apperception; (2) in the Transcendental Deduction and in the section of Paralogisms "I think" is taken in its representational nature.
In his Philosophical Treatise on the Immaterial Nature of the Soul, Knutzen defends the soul's nature as simple, immaterial, free, and immortal--an element of 'traditional metaphysics' attacked in the Paralogisms. Knutzen's underlying view of substance here clearly parallels Kant's in the First Analogy.
He elaborates his interpretation and defense of the condition of transcendental self-consciousness by discussing its role in each of the central arguments in the Critique in which the notion importantly figures: the transcendental deduction in both the first edition (chapters 2 and 3) and in the second (chapters 4 and 5), the Analogies of Experience (chapters 6 and 7), the Paralogisms (chapters 8 and 9), and the second-edition refutation of idealism (chapter 10).
Among further topics, Kitcher's treatment of the Paralogisms (chapter 7) is extremely useful, stressing that Kant needed them not merely to correct the errors of previous metaphysicians but also to warn against misinterpretation of his own conception of apperception; and her discussion of Kant's conception of systematicity as a scientific heuristic (chapter 8) is a suggestive treatment of a topic that was to become of increasing importance to Kant himself in the final decade of his career.
He also suggests that argumentation is able to produce aporias and paralogisms with existing processes of thought, maneuvers which would be incompatible with a trust in argument to settle conflicts and produce consensus (Differend 86).
Wuerth's recent publications include "The Paralogisms of Pure Reason" in The Cam bridge Companion to Kant's Critique of Pure Reason (2010) and as coeditor Perfecting Virtue: New Essays on Kantian Ethics and Virtue Ethics (2011).