tort

(redirected from Law of tort)
Also found in: Dictionary, Medical, Legal, Financial, Encyclopedia.
Graphic Thesaurus  🔍
Display ON
Animation ON
Legend
Synonym
Antonym
Related
  • noun

Synonyms for tort

(law) any wrongdoing for which an action for damages may be brought

References in periodicals archive ?
In the early nineteenth century and before, it was the poor law which was the principal legal provision for the victims of serious accidents at work, not the law of tort.
constitute a function for courts applying the common law of tort that is
Fleming, The Law of Torts (Sydney: The Law Book Company of Australia Pty.
27) Pollock was even more scathing--in a review of Winfield's Province of the Law of Tort written some years after Addison's death, he dismissed Addison as someone "for whose judgment nobody now cares a farthing", declared that Addison's "book on Tort was only less bad than his book on Contracts," and went on to take a swipe at those "who see nothing but shreds and patches in the law of civil wrongs.
In Anglo-American Common law of Tort, before the shift to be described below, two types of acts could lead to liability.
1645, 1652 (2014) ("[T]he legal norms the First Congress had in mind when enacting the ATS were not protean international law norms, but rather the domestic law of tort.
certainly that the common law of tort is best explained as if the judges
Having looked in some detail at Wittgenstein and Heidegger, we must now consider the ways in which their thinking illuminates the process of pursuing coherence in the law of tort.
Justice Chadwick concluded that policy considerations such as the effect of expanded liability on homeowners insurance, the role of deterrence embodied in Criminal Code and Highway Traffic Act sanctions, the role of government and profiting from liquor, and the role of government in compensating innocent motor vehicle accident victims dictate that the courts should not expand the law of tort to include host liability.
Postema, ed, Philosophy and the Law of Tort (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001), ch.
The empire of tort law would be all-encompassing; the role of contract law would be limited to what little is left over, such as expressly contracting out of tort liability or negotiating even better or stricter performance obligations than existed in the common law of tort, or by insurance.
Another difficult case arose in the context of the civil law, and, in particular, in relation to the civil law of tort (which has to do with civil wrongs) and to what has been called the parens patriae jurisdiction of the superior courts (which has to do with children).
The author relies heavily on an analogy with the law of tort and rejects the law of the place of enrichment as being in many cases hard to ascertain and potentially arbitrary (at 134).
She describes how common law works and its sources, including legislation and case law, the court and trial systems, the qualifications and work of legal personnel, including judges, solicitors, barrister, law officers and the Crown Prosecution Service, pre-trial civil procedures, constitutional law, equity and trusts, contract law, the law of tort, commercial and company law, and European Union Law.
The law of vicarious liability under law of torts is only applicable in civil matters.