Bill Clinton

(redirected from Clinton's Foreign Policy)
Also found in: Dictionary, Encyclopedia.
Graphic Thesaurus  🔍
Display ON
Animation ON
Legend
Synonym
Antonym
Related
  • noun

Synonyms for Bill Clinton

42nd President of the United States (1946-)

References in periodicals archive ?
In light of the preceding analysis, Clinton's foreign policy team would be well-advised to consider alternative approaches.
withdrawal and political reconciliation in Iraq, and Ambassadors Richard Holbrooke and George Mitchell tasked with hot-spots Afghanistan and the Middle East respectively, it seemed to some observers that Clinton's foreign policy portfolio and stature within the administration was diminishing, especially after losing battles appointing some ambassadors and staff.
In general, they supported Clinton's foreign policy, especially when he clashed with noninterventionist and realist Republicans.
Clinton's foreign policy decision making on strategic issues was chaotic at best.
In the spirit of the pragmatic meliorism that defined Clinton's foreign policy, Albright focuses on the need to nurture and support moderate religious forces at home and abroad.
Clinton's foreign policy in Russia; from deterrence and isolation to democratization and engagement.
My friend, a conservative aide to an even more conservative senator, is from the suburbs of Atlanta; his favorite word is "ignorant," by which he means some combination of insufficiently educated and totally deluded, and which he usually uses to describe Bill Clinton's foreign policy, or his ex-girlfriend, or a particularly memorable English professor.
Equally, on many issues Albright is indeed aware of the contortions of Clinton's foreign policy, as he sought to juggle the demands of the military and of the conservative right at home while living up to his commitments to allies abroad.
In fact, both Bush's and Clinton's foreign policy aides spent much time looking for ways to avoid acting momentously.
Other senior members of Clinton's foreign policy team confirmed Riedel's account that the administration had obtained unsettling intelligence about Pakistan's nuclear preparations.
So, it was natural that he became an important part of Clinton's foreign policy team.
Yet, in the hail of criticism of Clinton's foreign policy, the solitary agreement from the traditionalists and realists is on the expansion of NATO, clearly a Cold War instrument directed at large foreign enemies around military organization.
Thus, beyond the transcripts, the reader is subjected to a string of superficial overviews of Clinton's foreign policy, whose themes by now are familiar: global economics, democratization, international institutions, mediation in regional conflicts, "engagement" of China, and "enlargement" of NATO.