participle

(redirected from Future participle)
Also found in: Dictionary, Encyclopedia, Wikipedia.
  • noun

Synonyms for participle

a non-finite form of the verb

References in periodicals archive ?
The construction of [TEXT NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] with future participle is quite similar to the construction with [TEXT NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII], in that it occurs with roughly the same frequency and quite often with verbs of saying.
Although there are several factors to be taken into account, such as the fact that the corpus consists of both prose and poetry, we can say that the results presented in Table 5 more or less correspond to the semantic observations made earlier on: with verbs of state, the constructions of [TEXT NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] with aorist participle and [TEXT NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] with perfect participle are at the top, while for verbs of movement the constructions of [TEXT NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] with future participle are.
My corpus contains about fifty examples of clitic pronouns accompanying the following constructions: [TEXT NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] with aorist participle; [TEXT NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] with present, perfect and aorist participle; [TEXT NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] with present and future participle; [TEXT NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] with future participle; [TEXT NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] with aorist and perfect participle; [TEXT NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] with future participle and [TEXT NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] with present and perfect participle.
We have seen the examples of [TEXT NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] with future participle or [TEXT NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] with present participle, among others, showing signs of grammaticalisation in Ancient Greek.
As I noted above, however, the prototype model is not incompatible with diachronic considerations, which I have made with regard to the generalisation of the constructions of [TEXT NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] with future participle and [TEXT NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] with present participle.
Winkler's own, is the statement that the negative form of the future participle in -(o)no are forms in -(o)ntem (p.
Full browser ?